Skip to main content

Labour Market Opinions - Major Changes

The Canadian government has introduced major changes to the Labour Market Opinion (LMO) process for hiring temporary foreign workers.

With some limited exceptions, a Canadian employer is required to obtain an LMO if it wants to offer a job to a foreign national. An LMO is granted if there is a positive or neutral effect on the Canadian labour market.

Effective today, July 31, 2013, the following major changes to the LMO process were put into force.

Filing Fee

Until today, there was no cost to filing an LMO application. The filing fee is now $275 per position sought under the LMO. The fee is payable at the time that the LMO application is made. 

Language Requirements

An employer can only identify English and French as requirements for the job, both in the LMO application and advertising, unless the employer can demonstrate that a foreign language is essential to the position.

Advertising requirements

  • A minimum of 4 weeks of advertising is now required before an LMO application is filed. 
  • In addition to advertising in the National Job Bank, employers must show that they have used at least 2 other recruitment methods that are consistent with the practices for that particular occupation
    • For higher skilled occupations, efforts need to be national in scope
    • For lower skilled occupations, efforts must be made to target under-represented groups in the labour force
  • Active recruitment of Canadians for the position must continue until the LMO has been issued
Additional questions about the impact on the Canadian job market

Employers must answer additional questions on the LMO application to ensure that the program is not being used to facilitate the outsourcing of Canadian jobs.

You can find the full release here:


  1. A lot of on the net Jobs in advertising opportunities on the internet are really simply education applications intended for starting your online business.

  2. Simply letting anyone work anywhere - the crux of it, "simply". Nothing is simple in the Western Welfare Democracies. I am more than happy that people who simply want to work here are allowed to do so but that is not the nature of the migration

    Canada work permit


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What? There's a backlog?

If you work in immigration, it's no secret that most applications seem to take an inordinately long time to be reviewed. That's the case for almost all applications whether overseas or in-Canada. Well, it seems the government is trying to do 'something' about it.

The first change is to in-Canada H&C (humanitarian & compassionate) applications for permanent residence. Until now, all H&C applications were filed to the Case Processing Centre in Vegreville ("CPC-V"). Unfortunately, CPC-V did not make a decision on any applications where it felt that an interview was needed (99% of cases, it seems). So, all of those files would get transferred to the local CIC office where the applicant lived. For us, the Calgary office became EXTREMELY backlogged. Last year, I got a letter on a file telling me (and my client) that it was going to take 7 years for the Calgary office to make a decision! Now, for many people, the longer it takes, the better it i…

Refugee (Asylum) Claims - Understanding the Process

There has been a lot of news coverage about the influx of refugees (asylum seekers) into Canada via the United States, particularly into Quebec. This post is meant to explore who is entitled to make such a claim in Canada and what claimants can expect.

Eligibility to make the claimCanada and the US have entered into what's called a "safe third country agreement". Essentially, both countries consider the other to be relatively equal in terms of refugee protection and the refugee process. As such, there is an expectation for claimants to make their refugee claim in the first of these two countries. 
The practical consequence of this agreement is that it prevents individuals crossing from the US into Canada at a land border from making a claim in Canada. 
There are exceptions to this agreement: If the claimant has family in CanadaIf the claim is made at an in-land officeIf the claim is made at an airportThere are other eligibility factors as well, but this is the main issue aff…

Credibility vs. Plausibility in Refugee Claims

I recently appeared before the Federal Court on a judicial review of a negative Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision. The claimant was a Cuban national accused of flouting Cuba's currency controls.  The Applicant was self-represented at his refugee hearing before the Refugee Protection Division (RPD). As such, the corroborative evidence was far from idea. However, the RPD did find him to be detailed and consistent in his evidence. The RPD rejected the claimant's documents alleging they could not be independently verified to be authentic. However, the RPD made no actual efforts to verify the documents. The RPD also made a host of negative plausibility findings, which it said disposed of the claim in light of the lack of verifiable corroborative documents. The claimant exercised his appeal rights to the RAD, which agreed that the RPD had no basis to find the claimant's documents to be fraudulent. However, the RAD simply dismissed the claimant's corroborative documents…