Skip to main content

Bridging Work Permits - NEW!

Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) has just announced that as of December 15, 2012, permanent resident ("PR") applicants can obtain open work permits to bridge the gap while their PR applications are being finalized.

Individuals who have filed in the following categories can take advantage:
  • Federal Skilled Worker (FSW)
  • Canadian Experience Class (CEC)
  • Provincial Nominees (PNP)
  • Federal Skilled Trades Program (FSTP)
To be eligible, individuals with pending applications in one of the above 4 categories must meet the following criteria:
  • The foreign national is currently in Canada;
  • They have valid status on a WP that is due to expire within 4 months;
  • They have received a positive eligibility decision on their PR application under one of the Economic Class programs above, meaning:
    • FSW: the “Ministerial Instructions” status has been set to “Met” or a positive Final Determination of Eligibility letter/ e-mail has been sent. PNP: the “Eligibility EC-QC/PNP” status has been set to “Passed” or the Acknowledgment of Receipt letter/e-mail has been sent by the Centralized Intake Office (CIO).
      CEC: the “Eligibility CEC” decision has been set to “Passed” or the Acknowledgement of Receipt letter/e-mail has been sent from CIO.
      FSTP: the Acknowledgement of Receipt letter/e-mail has been sent from CIO
  • They have made application for an open WP.
These open work permits will be valid for a 1-year period, during which time most PR applications can be finalized. In the event that more time is required, extensions of the open work permit are to be considered on a case-by-case basis.

For the full Operations Bulletin, click here.

Comments

  1. Nice informative post dear. some useful information about How to Get Work Permit in Canada

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi What happens if the PR application is rejected after the open work permit has been issued? Is the open work permit still valid till the end date on it? My friends sister has got a refusal letter after she was issued a open work permit the date on which is still valid

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What? There's a backlog?

If you work in immigration, it's no secret that most applications seem to take an inordinately long time to be reviewed. That's the case for almost all applications whether overseas or in-Canada. Well, it seems the government is trying to do 'something' about it.



The BRO-V
The first change is to in-Canada H&C (humanitarian & compassionate) applications for permanent residence. Until now, all H&C applications were filed to the Case Processing Centre in Vegreville ("CPC-V"). Unfortunately, CPC-V did not make a decision on any applications where it felt that an interview was needed (99% of cases, it seems). So, all of those files would get transferred to the local CIC office where the applicant lived. For us, the Calgary office became EXTREMELY backlogged. Last year, I got a letter on a file telling me (and my client) that it was going to take 7 years for the Calgary office to make a decision! Now, for many people, the longer it takes, the better it i…

Refugee (Asylum) Claims - Understanding the Process

There has been a lot of news coverage about the influx of refugees (asylum seekers) into Canada via the United States, particularly into Quebec. This post is meant to explore who is entitled to make such a claim in Canada and what claimants can expect.

Eligibility to make the claimCanada and the US have entered into what's called a "safe third country agreement". Essentially, both countries consider the other to be relatively equal in terms of refugee protection and the refugee process. As such, there is an expectation for claimants to make their refugee claim in the first of these two countries. 
The practical consequence of this agreement is that it prevents individuals crossing from the US into Canada at a land border from making a claim in Canada. 
There are exceptions to this agreement: If the claimant has family in CanadaIf the claim is made at an in-land officeIf the claim is made at an airportThere are other eligibility factors as well, but this is the main issue aff…

Credibility vs. Plausibility in Refugee Claims

I recently appeared before the Federal Court on a judicial review of a negative Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision. The claimant was a Cuban national accused of flouting Cuba's currency controls.  The Applicant was self-represented at his refugee hearing before the Refugee Protection Division (RPD). As such, the corroborative evidence was far from idea. However, the RPD did find him to be detailed and consistent in his evidence. The RPD rejected the claimant's documents alleging they could not be independently verified to be authentic. However, the RPD made no actual efforts to verify the documents. The RPD also made a host of negative plausibility findings, which it said disposed of the claim in light of the lack of verifiable corroborative documents. The claimant exercised his appeal rights to the RAD, which agreed that the RPD had no basis to find the claimant's documents to be fraudulent. However, the RAD simply dismissed the claimant's corroborative documents…