Skip to main content

Alberta Immigrant Nominee Program (AINP) - update!

On February 29, 2012, I attended a meeting at which Brad Trefan spoke. Mr. Trefan is the Director of Human Services - Immigration Division at the AINP. He reported on the changes that occurred in 2011, and on some interesting changes coming to the program in the coming months.

Notable changes in 2011:
  1. Certain Tradespeople, working in a Compulsory or Optional Trade in Alberta could no longer apply under the Employer-Driven Stream. Their only option was to apply under the Strategic Recruitment Stream.
  2. NOC B, C, D work permit holders are now limited to holding work permits for a maximum of four years (April 2011). Expect to see a surge in AINP applications in about April 2013 as those individuals approach their maximum time in Canada.
  3. Permanent Residence applicatoins by AINP nominated individuals are now being filed to the Centralized Intake Office (CIO) in Ottawa for the initial assessment.
Notable changes coming in 2012:
  1. Significant reduction in processing times. Employer-driven skilled workers and those that apply under the strategic recrutiment stream are being processed within a few days! Semi-skilled workers are processed within a few months.
  2. Minimum language requirements for those in NOC C and D occupations starting July 1, 2012. There will be a transition period and excpetions made.
  3. There will be an increased focus on the ability to economically establish. This will affect semi-skilled workers the most as their wages, in conjunction with the number of accompanying dependents, will dicatate their ability to economically establish in Alberta.
  4. There will be an effort to standardize the criteria in the semi-skilled streams to improve processing efficiencies.
Overall, the AINP has become an attractive option for seeking permanent residence, especially in light of the signifcant improvements in processing times!


  1. Simply letting anyone work anywhere - the crux of it, "simply". Nothing is simple in the Western Welfare Democracies. I am more than happy that people who simply want to work here are allowed to do so but that is not the nature of the migration

    Australia Skilled Immigration


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Age of Dependent Child - now 'under 22'

Today is the day! The age of dependent children is to revert back to 'under 22'. You can read the original release here. The previous changes had lowered the age of dependent children to under 19 and removed the exception for those enrolled in post-secondary education. Going forward, a "dependent child" is any biological or adopted child of the parent, who is in one of the following situations of dependency: Is under 22 and not a spouse or common-law partner;is 22 or older but has depended substantially on the financial support of the parent since before the age of 22 and is unable to be financially self-supporting due to a physical or mental condition  Those who have pending permanent residence applications can now add their under 22 children to their application, if they were formerly prevented from doing so when the age limit was under 19. Those whose permanent residence applications have been finalized may be in a position to sponsor their under 22 child

Refugee (Asylum) Claims - Understanding the Process

There has been a lot of news coverage about the influx of refugees (asylum seekers) into Canada via the United States, particularly into Quebec. This post is meant to explore who is entitled to make such a claim in Canada and what claimants can expect.

Eligibility to make the claimCanada and the US have entered into what's called a "safe third country agreement". Essentially, both countries consider the other to be relatively equal in terms of refugee protection and the refugee process. As such, there is an expectation for claimants to make their refugee claim in the first of these two countries. 
The practical consequence of this agreement is that it prevents individuals crossing from the US into Canada at a land border from making a claim in Canada. 
There are exceptions to this agreement: If the claimant has family in CanadaIf the claim is made at an in-land officeIf the claim is made at an airportThere are other eligibility factors as well, but this is the main issue aff…

HUGE decision by SCC - Conditional Sentences & Serious Criminality for Permanent Residents

The Supreme Court of Canada just released its decision in the Tran case. At issue in the case was the interpretation to be given to section 36(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), which reads:
36 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality for (a) having been convicted in Canada of an offence under an Act of Parliament punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10 years, or of an offence under an Act of Parliament for which a term of imprisonment of more than six months has been imposed;
Any permanent residents found to be inadmissible for "serious criminality" lost their right of appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) pursuant to section 64 of IRPA:
64 (1) No appeal may be made to the Immigration Appeal Division by a foreign national or their sponsor or by a permanent resident if the foreign national or permanent resident has been found to be inadmissible on grounds of securi…