Skip to main content

Legal access for the most vulnerable

Wow, tardy in my posting! Will attempt to make up for it.

Today, I attended a Canadian Bar Association (CBA) Immigration Section meeting. The two speakers were from Legal Aid Alberta. Richard Bennett is Legal Aid's Calgary Immigration counsel.

Legal Aid provides legal services to individuals who cannot afford to hire private lawyers. It is limited to areas of law that have a direct impact on people's lives, liberty or security. Areas such as criminal law, family law, and immigration are examples. Each province has its own Legal Aid services. Funding is provided both by the Provincial and Federal Governments to varying degrees.

Legal Aid's immigration files only account for about 3% of all their work. Some of the types of immigration services offered include:

  • Refugee Claims
  • Admissibility hearings
  • Detention reviews
  • Removal Appeals for Permanent Residents
  • Ministerial Appeals
  • Judicial Review (related to above areas)
  • Legal advice (meaning no actual representation) for matters such as extensions, H&Cs, sponsorships, appeals, and PRRAs.
In order to get Legal Aid coverage, you have to meet their income requirements. That is, you have to earn less than their established income levels. These maximum income levels are incredibly low, meaning only a handful of people will ever qualify for legal aid. For example, for a family of 4, they total family income cannot exceed $2,333 per month (net)!

Applicants who qualify will be represented by the staff lawyer, or will be referred to a "roster" lawyer (a private lawyer who registers with Legal Aid to work on files). 

I think the most common type of immigration client for legal aid are those making a refugee claim. When someone comes to Canada and makes such a claim, they have virtually no money available to them. They are not able to get a work permit for several months, typically. So, they can get some legal aid assistance at the outset. However, often times, once the client gets their work permit, they make too much money to qualify for continued legal aid. 


It's sad that Legal Aid services have dwindled so much in the immigration world. It's an area of law that is very specialized and hiring an inexperienced lawyer can be disastrous to a person's life. I suppose it's better than the alternative - not having any funding at all!

Comments

  1. Thanks for sharing this awesome post. There are so many private legal firms providing legal services. JJ Kelly Barrister is a group of experienced lawyers and provide their best services. For free consultation visit: http://criminallawcalgary.ca/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What? There's a backlog?

If you work in immigration, it's no secret that most applications seem to take an inordinately long time to be reviewed. That's the case for almost all applications whether overseas or in-Canada. Well, it seems the government is trying to do 'something' about it.



The BRO-V
The first change is to in-Canada H&C (humanitarian & compassionate) applications for permanent residence. Until now, all H&C applications were filed to the Case Processing Centre in Vegreville ("CPC-V"). Unfortunately, CPC-V did not make a decision on any applications where it felt that an interview was needed (99% of cases, it seems). So, all of those files would get transferred to the local CIC office where the applicant lived. For us, the Calgary office became EXTREMELY backlogged. Last year, I got a letter on a file telling me (and my client) that it was going to take 7 years for the Calgary office to make a decision! Now, for many people, the longer it takes, the better it i…

Refugee (Asylum) Claims - Understanding the Process

There has been a lot of news coverage about the influx of refugees (asylum seekers) into Canada via the United States, particularly into Quebec. This post is meant to explore who is entitled to make such a claim in Canada and what claimants can expect.

Eligibility to make the claimCanada and the US have entered into what's called a "safe third country agreement". Essentially, both countries consider the other to be relatively equal in terms of refugee protection and the refugee process. As such, there is an expectation for claimants to make their refugee claim in the first of these two countries. 
The practical consequence of this agreement is that it prevents individuals crossing from the US into Canada at a land border from making a claim in Canada. 
There are exceptions to this agreement: If the claimant has family in CanadaIf the claim is made at an in-land officeIf the claim is made at an airportThere are other eligibility factors as well, but this is the main issue aff…

Credibility vs. Plausibility in Refugee Claims

I recently appeared before the Federal Court on a judicial review of a negative Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision. The claimant was a Cuban national accused of flouting Cuba's currency controls.  The Applicant was self-represented at his refugee hearing before the Refugee Protection Division (RPD). As such, the corroborative evidence was far from idea. However, the RPD did find him to be detailed and consistent in his evidence. The RPD rejected the claimant's documents alleging they could not be independently verified to be authentic. However, the RPD made no actual efforts to verify the documents. The RPD also made a host of negative plausibility findings, which it said disposed of the claim in light of the lack of verifiable corroborative documents. The claimant exercised his appeal rights to the RAD, which agreed that the RPD had no basis to find the claimant's documents to be fraudulent. However, the RAD simply dismissed the claimant's corroborative documents…