Skip to main content

Proposed reduction to Skilled Immigrants, Parents, and Grandparents in 2011

On February 13, 2011, Minister Kenney boasted that 2010 saw the highest numbers of legal immigrants entering Canada, in the last 50 years. That number was estimated at just over 280,000. About 1/3 were economic immigrants (such as Federal Skilled Workers, Canadian Experience Class Applicants, and those nominated under the various Provincial Nominee Programs). Minister Kenny emphasized Canada's goals of using skilled immigrants to bolster the Canadian economy, and Canada's prosperity.

However, just a few days later on February 16, 2011, information obtained through Access to Information requests showed that for 2011, the government planned to reduce the number of Federal Skill Workers who would be admitted to Canada by as much as 20%! The number of parents and grandparents who are sponsored to Canada is also expected to be reduced.

Minister Kenney's response was that a trade-off was needed in terms of who was allowed to immigrate to Canada. He stated that the government was focused on "economic growth and prosperity", and would encourage immigrants who could work, pay taxes, and contribute to the health-care system once admitted. If this is in fact the government's focus, does it explain the proposed significant reduction in skilled immigration to Canada?

Will the reduction to family class (parents/grandparents) sponsorships affect skilled immigrants from wanting to come to Canada? Maybe. Extended families are often common in other countries. Skilled individuals often choose to immigrate to Canada because they can later sponsor other family members. If they are now prevented from doing so, the result could be that such individuals choose some other country to which they will immigrate. This is a loss to Canada.

Right now, according to processing times posted by Citizenship and Immigration Canada, it is taking upwards of 41 months for the sponsor to be assessed, and a further 12-57 months (depending on the country) for the visa office to process the permanent residence applications of those coming! If fewer people are admitted each year under the family class, those who have applied will undoubtedly continue to wait even longer for their turn.

Although these parents and grandparents may not "work" in the traditional sense, they often assist the newly immigrated family to establish themselves in Canada, and to succeed. With the rising cost of childcare in Canada, these individuals provide an invaluable service to working immigrants, who otherwise may not be able to afford childcare while employed outside the home. It also helps new skilled immigrants to have family support close by. Living in North America can be very isolating for many individuals who immigrate here.

In short, I think this week's immigration developments send a confusing message as to what our government wants in terms of immigration to Canada.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What? There's a backlog?

If you work in immigration, it's no secret that most applications seem to take an inordinately long time to be reviewed. That's the case for almost all applications whether overseas or in-Canada. Well, it seems the government is trying to do 'something' about it.

The first change is to in-Canada H&C (humanitarian & compassionate) applications for permanent residence. Until now, all H&C applications were filed to the Case Processing Centre in Vegreville ("CPC-V"). Unfortunately, CPC-V did not make a decision on any applications where it felt that an interview was needed (99% of cases, it seems). So, all of those files would get transferred to the local CIC office where the applicant lived. For us, the Calgary office became EXTREMELY backlogged. Last year, I got a letter on a file telling me (and my client) that it was going to take 7 years for the Calgary office to make a decision! Now, for many people, the longer it takes, the better it i…

Refugee (Asylum) Claims - Understanding the Process

There has been a lot of news coverage about the influx of refugees (asylum seekers) into Canada via the United States, particularly into Quebec. This post is meant to explore who is entitled to make such a claim in Canada and what claimants can expect.

Eligibility to make the claimCanada and the US have entered into what's called a "safe third country agreement". Essentially, both countries consider the other to be relatively equal in terms of refugee protection and the refugee process. As such, there is an expectation for claimants to make their refugee claim in the first of these two countries. 
The practical consequence of this agreement is that it prevents individuals crossing from the US into Canada at a land border from making a claim in Canada. 
There are exceptions to this agreement: If the claimant has family in CanadaIf the claim is made at an in-land officeIf the claim is made at an airportThere are other eligibility factors as well, but this is the main issue aff…

Credibility vs. Plausibility in Refugee Claims

I recently appeared before the Federal Court on a judicial review of a negative Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision. The claimant was a Cuban national accused of flouting Cuba's currency controls.  The Applicant was self-represented at his refugee hearing before the Refugee Protection Division (RPD). As such, the corroborative evidence was far from idea. However, the RPD did find him to be detailed and consistent in his evidence. The RPD rejected the claimant's documents alleging they could not be independently verified to be authentic. However, the RPD made no actual efforts to verify the documents. The RPD also made a host of negative plausibility findings, which it said disposed of the claim in light of the lack of verifiable corroborative documents. The claimant exercised his appeal rights to the RAD, which agreed that the RPD had no basis to find the claimant's documents to be fraudulent. However, the RAD simply dismissed the claimant's corroborative documents…